🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a young person who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," stated a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the local government level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some figures to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies take a more measured position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this global conversation unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states internationally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.