🔗 Share this article

Conservative reactions to the partial release of files involving the Epstein case have been mixed, with certain backers of the previous administration highlighting the noticeable presence of Bill Clinton and additional Democratic figures in images, while different voices expressed frustration over how heavy redactions cast Donald Trump and Republicans in a unfavorable light.

Justice Department Defends Redactions with Strong Rhetoric

Justice Department officials defended the heavily censored sections with fervent hyperbole. “Never in American the nation's history has a President or the Justice Department been so open with the American people about such a sensitive legal matter,” declared Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who released a six-page memo outlining the censorship process.

Questions Prompted by Blacked-Out Sections

While the former president's identity and image are visible in some of the materials, the extensive redactions raise significant questions about what may be concealed beneath them. Some conservative lawmakers immediately called for greater openness.

“The public are furious and disengaging,” wrote Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Via a social media post, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie asserted the redactions violate the law, and suggested that a future Congress may attempt to remove the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, for that violation. “Unfortunately, this file dump egregiously fails to comply with both the intent and the letter of the law,” he continued.

A Faction of Rightwing Figures Rally In Support of the Release

But, some conservative pundits and former President loyalists came out strongly behind the Justice Department's actions.

The disclosed materials—from a justice department led by key Trump associate Pam Bondi—includes scores of pages that are entirely censored, and many of the men depicted in photographs have their identities blacked out.

But a few do not, featuring high-profile figures like Clinton, pop singer Michael Jackson, and academic Noam Chomsky. The inclusion of the former president, especially, allowed some rightwing voices to launch the offensive.

“This is quite rich how the political left wrongly claimed President Trump of associating with a sex offender, only for the Trump DOJ to release documents that show Bill Clinton skinny dipping with a pedophile,” wrote right-wing commentator Laura Loomer.

“Recently released documents show Bill Clinton shirtless in a jacuzzi with a female that is not his spouse Hillary Clinton,” posted lawyer Rogan O’Handley. “There’s only one reason Epstein would take pictures of a Commander-in-Chief with a girl in a jacuzzi: Leverage.”

Clinton Spokesperson Releases Response

Bill Clinton has repeatedly said he knew of zero illegal activity by Epstein and has not been accused to have participated in any wrongdoing. “The White House hasn’t been concealing these files for months only to release them late on a Friday to protect Bill Clinton,” his spokesperson Angel Ureña said in a comment.

“This is about protecting officials from what comes next, or from information they will try and hide permanently. Therefore they can publicize as many grainy 20-plus-year-old photos as they desire, but it isn’t about Bill Clinton. Never has, never will be,” the statement added.

Overall Conservative Comment Seems Muted

However, overall comment on the right was relatively muted following the release, especially when juxtaposed against the loud calls for transparency that preceded the legislative approval to pass a law requiring the files' release.

Loomer, who recently accepted press credentials at the Defense Department, had been one of the most vocal advocates for a complete disclosure. In February, she chastised the Justice Department broadly and Bondi in particular after a set of rightwing personalities were given hard-copy binders of files that included little previously unseen data.